

# Gag Order Temporarily Lifted in Trump's New York Civil Fraud Trial

In a recent development in the ongoing civil fraud trial against former President **Donald Trump** and his company, the **Trump Organization**, a New York appeals court judge has temporarily lifted a gag order that was previously imposed on Trump and his attorneys (1,2,3,4,5,6).

The gag order, originally issued by **Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron**, had been put in place to prevent Trump from making public statements about court staff, including Engoron's chief law clerk, **Allison Greenfield** (1,2,3,4,5). However, Judge David Friedman, citing constitutional concerns about restricting Trump's free speech, issued a stay of the gag order (1,3).

> "The order could potentially violate Trump's constitutional right to free speech," stated Judge David Friedman (1).

Trump's legal team has filed a motion for a mistrial, alleging bias displayed by Engoron and Greenfield (1,2,3,4,5,6). They argue that the judge's rulings and Greenfield's influence over the trial are unfair and infringe on Trump's right to free speech, particularly as he is a potential GOP front-runner for the 2024 presidential election (1,3,5).

> "The judge has shown 'astonishing departures from ordinary standards of impartiality'," Trump's lawyers claimed in their motion for a mistrial (6).

The **New York Attorney General Letitia James** is prosecuting the case, alleging that Trump and his company deceived lenders, insurers, and tax authorities by inflating property values using misleading appraisals (2,4,5,6). 

> "The Trump Organization exaggerated his wealth on financial statements, seeking over $300 million in ill-gotten gains," James stated (6).

However, Trump's defense argues that the financial statements were not misleading, and that different people can come up with different property values. They claim there was no intent to defraud and that any differences in property values were not meaningful (2,5).

The lifting of the gag order and the motion for a mistrial have sparked a debate about the role of the judiciary and the right to free speech. Some critics argue that the gag order was necessary to maintain the integrity of the trial, while others see it as an infringement on Trump's constitutional rights (1,2,3,4,5,6).

The implications of this case could be significant, potentially affecting future legal proceedings involving public figures and their right to free speech. It also raises questions about the potential influence of court staff on trial outcomes and the importance of impartiality in the judiciary.

The New York Attorney General's office has yet to comment on the lifting of the gag order (1). The court's decision on the motion for a mistrial is also pending, and the outcome could have a significant impact on the course of the trial (6).

<h1>Gag Order Temporarily Lifted in Trump's New York Civil Fraud Trial</h1>
In a recent development in the ongoing civil fraud trial against former President Donald Trump and his company, the Trump Organization, a New York appeals court judge has temporarily lifted a gag order that was previously imposed on Trump and his attorneys (1,2,3,4,5,6).
The gag order, originally issued by Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron, had been put in place to prevent Trump from making public statements about court staff, including Engoron's chief law clerk, Allison Greenfield (1,2,3,4,5). However, Judge David Friedman, citing constitutional concerns about restricting Trump's free speech, issued a stay of the gag order (1,3).
<blockquote>
"The order could potentially violate Trump's constitutional right to free speech," stated Judge David Friedman (1).
</blockquote>
Trump's legal team has filed a motion for a mistrial, alleging bias displayed by Engoron and Greenfield (1,2,3,4,5,6). They argue that the judge's rulings and Greenfield's influence over the trial are unfair and infringe on Trump's right to free speech, particularly as he is a potential GOP front-runner for the 2024 presidential election (1,3,5).
<blockquote>
"The judge has shown 'astonishing departures from ordinary standards of impartiality'," Trump's lawyers claimed in their motion for a mistrial (6).
</blockquote>
The New York Attorney General Letitia James is prosecuting the case, alleging that Trump and his company deceived lenders, insurers, and tax authorities by inflating property values using misleading appraisals (2,4,5,6).
<blockquote>
"The Trump Organization exaggerated his wealth on financial statements, seeking over $300 million in ill-gotten gains," James stated (6).
</blockquote>
However, Trump's defense argues that the financial statements were not misleading, and that different people can come up with different property values. They claim there was no intent to defraud and that any differences in property values were not meaningful (2,5).
The lifting of the gag order and the motion for a mistrial have sparked a debate about the role of the judiciary and the right to free speech. Some critics argue that the gag order was necessary to maintain the integrity of the trial, while others see it as an infringement on Trump's constitutional rights (1,2,3,4,5,6).
The implications of this case could be significant, potentially affecting future legal proceedings involving public figures and their right to free speech. It also raises questions about the potential influence of court staff on trial outcomes and the importance of impartiality in the judiciary.
The New York Attorney General's office has yet to comment on the lifting of the gag order (1). The court's decision on the motion for a mistrial is also pending, and the outcome could have a significant impact on the course of the trial (6).

The Guardian

New York judge suspends Trump gag order in fraud trial, citing free speech

Judge temporarily lifts gag order in Trump’s civil fraud trial

4029 News

Donald Trump files for mistrial in his New York civil fraud case, saying judge is biased

Newsweek

Donald Trump's Legal Hail Mary Likely Doomed to Fail

New York Post

Appeals court temporarily lifts Trump gag order in NY civil fraud case

Breitbart

New York Appeals Court Lifts Gag Order on Trump in Fraud Trial

Donald Trump

New York Civil Fraud Trial

Gag Order

Judge Arthur Engoron

Allison Greenfield

Letitia James

Trump Organization

A New York appeals court judge temporarily lifted a gag order on Donald Trump in his civil fraud trial. Trump's lawyers filed a motion for mistrial, alleging bias from the trial judge.

Gag Order Temporarily Lifted in Trump's New York Civil Fraud Trial

Newsletter

Stay Connected